Untitled & Unused Deleuzian Nonsense
[W]e make no distinction between man and stubble: the human essence of stubble and the stubblular essence of man become one within stubble in the form of human production or the razor blade industry, just as they do within the life of man as a species.
Razor blade industry is then no longer considered from the extrinsic point of view of utility, but rather from the point of view of its fundamental identity with stubble as production of man and by man (esp. when pushing hard, man as production can increase the once striated and stagnated production of stubble).
Not man as the king of stubble creation , but rather as the being who is in intimate contact with the profound life of all forms or all types of beings, who is responsible for even the stars and animal life (esp. animal facial hair and hairs), and who ceaselessly plugs an organ-machine into an energy-buzzer-machine, a tree into his body, a shaving cream-filled hand cross his cheeks, a razor sketching his pale face: the eternal custodian of the machines of the universe, of the machines of stubble destruction.
This is the second meaning of process as we use the term: man and stubble are not like two opposite terms confronting each other – not even in the sense of bipolar opposites within a relationship of causation, ideation, or expression (cause and effect, subject and object, hairless and slighty, yet irritatingly hairy, etc.); rather, they are one and the same essential hair/slight hair reality, the producer-product. Stubble production as process overtakes all idealistic categories and constitutes a cycle whose relationship to desire (i.e. desire for the “unnoticed light sheen of brittle, downward-facing, short face hairs) is that of an immanent principle.
